Thursday, September 26, 2013

Ratepayers address municipal inspection report

Ratepayer's Association meeting
J. MacFarlane photo
Joni MacFarlane, Crowsnest Voice

Several candidates for municipal council made a pitch for voter support at a Crowsnest Pass Ratepayers Association meeting last night.

As the last regularly scheduled meeting by the organization before the election, it was an opportunity for candidates to introduce themselves and discuss issues they want addressed.

Association President Bill Kovach made it clear that any of the current executive members who are successful in their bid for a council seat will resign their Ratepayers position.

Kovach also spoke briefly on the inspection report conducted by Russell Farmer & Associates Consulting Ltd.


On the positive side, he said a total of 71 people were interviewed for the report, it was completed on time, and the issues presented meant it would surely become a campaign issue.

“Our mayor and council are going to have one slant on the report and we are going to have a different slant on the report and that’s okay, but this is my take on the report,” he said.

After going through it, said Kovach, there were only a few things he found disappointing.

First, everything the ratepayers said was “perceived to be” but everything council or administration said was “gospel”.

“If it’s perceived, then to me, there wasn’t enough research being done between what [Farmer] perceived we were thinking and what was actually the truth,” said Kovach.

Also, many of the statistics ended in 2011 and didn’t include current data.

Most glaring, said Kovach, was the comment that Crowsnest Pass had failed at amalgamation.

“I get so sick and tired of people saying we failed with this community. Since 1979 we’ve all worked together. We’ve sat on boards, we’ve volunteered on committees, we’ve volunteered to keep the mine going, a ski hill, a pool, a museum. You name it, we do everything together,” said Kovach. “Do we have problems? Of course we have problems, but we haven’t failed.”

Kovach said he was very pleased to see 87 recommendations but angered that one talked about a viability review.
The report confirmed, to Kovach, that the municipality was so busy passing bylaws and policies, that they “forgot to look at the business at hand”.

Kovach also said the report confirmed fees have increased, that there is poor communication with municipal staff and unionized employees, that taxes are high, that salaries and staffing levels of municipal employees are higher than comparative communities, that administration was moving money in the general ledgers, and that costs associated with the strategic plan have not been provided.

“[Farmer] recognized in… the costs for implementing the strategic plan versus our operations, there’s a problem,” Kovach told Ratepayers.

After this, candidates had the opportunity to address the meeting. Dave Filipuzzi, Blair Painter, Dean Ward, Sasha JaegerBaird, Ed Strembicki, Marlene Anctil, Doreen Glavin, and Bill Kovach provided a brief introduction. John Prince chose not to comment and no incumbents were present.

Other issues raised at the meeting were municipal staff dissatisfaction and grievances, reduced Public Works staff, consultants hired by the municipality, council transparency, and communication problems with council and administration.

Several people commented on the removal of asbestos at the Crowsnest Centre and questioned the safety of the process.

Kovach encouraged people to get out vote and asked for volunteers to drive those who needed rides.

A public forum hosted by the Crowsnest Pass Chamber of Commerce will be held on Thursday, Oct. 10 at the MDM Community Complex at 7 p.m. A second forum is tentatively scheduled with the date to be determined.

Everyone is encouraged to attend and ask questions of the candidates.

6 comments:

  1. "No incumbents were present". More like "No incumbents were invited". They couldn't have anyone correcting their stories.

    The Ratepayers are full of it. They wanted the inspection but when it comes back saying that basically nothing is wrong, they get their undies in a knot. I'm not voting for a single Ratepayer associated candidate. These people have done more to hold back our community than anyone else I have ever seen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. More one-sided, slanted and poisonous journalism from Joni MacFarlane... just what we've come to expect.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Basically nothing wrong is like a little bit pregnant the municipality was just able to cover their tracks well enough. and if you read the whole report not bruces opinion you will see the crimes. Using the peace officers as their very own PINKERTONs. Might have to google that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read the whole report. There were a number of recommendations, mostly for the town staff, but NOTHING that called out any wrong doing. Not sure what report you read.

      Delete
    2. I read the report. It said that the town was being managed just fine. I'm not sure what you were reading.

      Delete
  4. "John Prince declined to speak"

    I'm surprised he even showed up... He did a big 180 on the Ratepayers when they (rightfully so) decided not to back him for mayor. He was once lauding them, and now he despises him.

    Like sands through the insane hourglass.... these are the days of our lives.

    ReplyDelete